About

  • Mitch Harper, editor [contact via email]

    Original content, commentary and analysis © 2005 - 2016 Fort Wayne Observed

    Banner photo © Everett White. Used by permission, all rights reserved.
My Photo

Comments

  • Fort Wayne Observed welcomes reader comments as a way to facilitate discussion and debate.

    In order to leave a comment, you must also leave your full name and a working email address in the event Fort Wayne Observed contacts you for confirmation. You may request that your email address not be published when your comment is posted.

    Anonymous comments or those that include coarse language or personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Updates

Your Take

Indiana Blogs

statistics



  • eXTReMe Tracker

Become a Fan

« A conversation with Nelson Peters | Main | Talarico breaks down Kelty's poll comments »

Comments

Sam Talarico, Jr.

I need to offer this disclaimer before I start: I support Nelson Peters for mayor.

Ok, now thats out of the way, I want to comment on the absolute absurdity of Kelty's comments on the poll.

Clearly Matt Kelty understands the concept of an "in-kind" campaign contribution. His last campaign finance report was loaded with them and these "in-kind" contributions helped fluff up his report considerably to mask the $18,000 in cash he had actually raised from those other than himself. His campaign manager's services (which includes the providing of INFORMATION") were correctly listed as "in-kind" contributions.

If indeed his CPA were asked to prepare financial reports or financial statements of any type and if his CPA does not charge the campaign for such services, then this is an in-kind contribution. Kelty, IS correct that if he bumps into his CPA on the street and the CPA provides information that the "community has a billion dollars in debt on the books" that this is NOT an in-kind contribution of "information".

The Poll, however, is a no-brainer. It could not be clearer that this poll was prepared for Kelty's use. When is the last time you heard a group of non polticians decide to just go drop $10,000 on a zogby poll just to see what is going on? This is laughable. This was commissioned for political use AND it was not given to the Peters Campaign; it was not given to Tom Henry's campaign; it was not given to Ivan Hoods campaign; and it was not given directly to the newspapers. It was given to Matt Kelty for his use (his brilliant use I might add) in his campaign. This very expensive zogby poll was contributed to Matt Kelty for use in his campaign, period. This literally defines what an "in-kind" contribution is.

I cannot for the life of me figure out why either:

1. Matt Kelty does not want people to know who paid for the poll? or

2. Why these Kelty supporters do not want people to know that they are supporting Kelty (and why are they making Kelty embarrass himself by having to dance around this issue)?; or

3. Why these Harrison Square opponents dont want people to know that they are opposing the project?

I dont get. It just doesnt make sense to me.

Sam Talarico, Jr.

Jason Blosser

It's only fair to wait until the rest of the interview is posted, but Kelty's responses aren't helping me feel too good about continuing my support for him.

Nelson Peters did a superb this week on WOWO, and if Matt Kelty has a chance in the primaries, he is going to need to significantly ratchet up his communication skills, including a sound delivery of his plan to save the Fort from continued mediocrity.

Ron Reinking

re: In his own words: Matt Kelty on the Poll

The recent interview with Matt Kelty referenced research information that I have used in some of my presentations and public writings and could (and apparently has) been misintrepreted.
1. Mr. Kelty and I met just last week and he is not a client of mine.
2. The financial information he referenced was presented at the Rotary Club in a formal meeting with about 80 in attendance. My notes were made available to any attendees that expressed interest.
3. Mr. Kelty badly misrepresented my findings. Allen County taxpayers are not 1 billion in debt, but with the approved or pending proposals debt will exceed 2 billion.
Ron Reinking, CPA

The comments to this entry are closed.